Scan Another

CVE Scan for hartwigmedicalfoundation/esvee:1.2.1

Docker image vulnerability scanner

9 Known Vulnerabilities in this Docker Image

0
Critical
1
High
6
Medium
0
Low
0
Info/ Unspecified/ Unknown
CVE IDSeverityPackageAffected VersionFixed VersionCVSS Score
CVE-2026-102554highguava>=4.0,<=33.7.133.7.28.2

CompactHashMap/CompactHashSet/MapMakerInternalMap native deserialization triggers uncontrolled memory allocation

Summary

CompactHashMap, CompactHashSet, and MapMakerInternalMap implement readObject(ObjectInputStream) by reading an attacker-controlled elementCount or initialCapacity from the stream. On the very first insertion during or after deserialization (for the CompactHash* collections, inside allocArrays()) or immediately during deserialization (for MapMakerInternalMap), the implementation eagerly allocates arrays sized to that full, unvalidated value (up to CompactHashing.MAX_SIZE = 2^30-1, ~1.07 billion, for example) before the rest of the stream's actual content has been consumed. A 72-byte malicious serialized stream containing a single tiny element can force a multi-gigabyte allocation and crash a JVM with OutOfMemoryError, dynamically confirmed against the current release.

Details

CompactHashMap.readObject() (guava/src/com/google/common/collect/CompactHashMap.java):

private void readObject(ObjectInputStream stream) throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
  stream.defaultReadObject();
  int elementCount = stream.readInt();
  if (elementCount < 0) {
    throw new InvalidObjectException("Invalid size: " + elementCount);
  }
  init(elementCount);
  for (int i = 0; i < elementCount; i++) {
    K key = (K) stream.readObject();
    V value = (V) stream.readObject();
    put(key, value);
  }
}

elementCount is only checked for being non-negative; there is no upper bound and no relationship enforced between the declared count and how much data actually follows in the stream. init(elementCount) (line 251) just stores the value (clamped to [1, CompactHashing.MAX_SIZE], i.e. up to 2^30-1):

void init(int expectedSize) {
  Preconditions.checkArgument(expectedSize >= 0, "Expected size must be >= 0");
  this.metadata = Ints.constrainToRange(expectedSize, 1, CompactHashing.MAX_SIZE);
}

The real allocation is deferred to allocArrays(), which fires lazily on the first put() call — i.e. after only one key/value pair has actually been read off the wire:

int allocArrays() {
  ...
  int expectedSize = metadata;
  int buckets = CompactHashing.tableSize(expectedSize);
  this.table = CompactHashing.createTable(buckets);
  setHashTableMask(buckets - 1);
  this.entries = new int[expectedSize];
  this.keys = new Object[expectedSize];
  this.values = new Object[expectedSize];
  return expectedSize;
}

With expectedSize near CompactHashing.MAX_SIZE (2^30-1), this single call allocates a hash table plus three expectedSize-length arrays — multiple gigabytes — triggered by a stream that has, at that point, only supplied one small real element. CompactHashSet.readObject()/allocArrays() have the identical shape. CompactLinkedHashMap/CompactLinkedHashSet extend these classes and inherit the same unguarded path.

The problem with MapMakerInternalMap is similar, with a size read from the serialized data and stored in a MapMaker instance for later user during deserialization, when the MapMaker is passed back to MapMakerInternalMap and segments are allocated by calling newSegment, whose implementations (example) create Segment instances (example) that allocate arrays of the requested capacity through the newTable helper.

This is the same amplification shape as the already-fixed CVE-2018-10237 (AtomicDoubleArray/CompoundOrdering: attacker declares a large size, library eagerly allocates before validating against actual stream content). That fix rewrote AtomicDoubleArray.readObject() to grow an ImmutableLongArray.Builder incrementally per element actually read, rather than pre-allocating from the declared size — Guava's own HashBiMap.readObject() documents the same defensive principle explicitly in a comment: init(16); // resist hostile attempts to allocate gratuitous heap. CompactHashMap/CompactHashSet do not follow either of these two patterns already present elsewhere in the same codebase.

Reachability: All classes are top-level, implements ... Serializable, and require no special classpath setup beyond Guava being present (near-ubiquitous on JVM backends). A native Java deserialization attacker names the class directly in a hand-crafted stream — no particular Guava factory method needs to have been used by the victim application, exactly as with the precedent CVE.

PoC

Full source and run instructions in the attached poc-guava-compacthash-dos.zip (Maven project, guava:33.7.1-jre — the current latest release — as the only dependency). The PoC:

  1. Uses reflection only to legitimately obtain a CompactHashSet instance (it is package-private; a real attacker does not need this step, since they craft the serialized bytes directly rather than calling Guava's own serialization code).
  2. Serializes one set with 1 element and one with 2 elements, diffs the two byte streams to locate the exact offset of the elementCount field (byte-precise, not guessed).
  3. Patches that one 4-byte field in the 1-element stream from 1 to 0x3FFFFFFF (CompactHashing.MAX_SIZE), leaving the rest of the 72-byte stream (one real "A" element) untouched.
  4. Feeds the resulting 72-byte malicious stream into a plain new ObjectInputStream(...).readObject() call against the real, unmodified guava-33.7.1-jre.jar.

Actual run output:

### -Xmx8g (generous heap) ###
Located size field at offset 63, value=1 (expected 1)
Malicious stream size: 72 bytes
Declared elementCount: 1073741823 (~1.07 billion)
Real payload: 1 tiny string element ("A")
=== RESULT ===
Exception: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
Time to allocate+fail: 4013 ms
Heap used before: 3 MB
Heap used after (at failure point): 4103 MB
JVM max heap (-Xmx): 8192 MB

### -Xmx128m (ordinary service-sized heap) ###
Located size field at offset 63, value=1 (expected 1)
Malicious stream size: 72 bytes
Declared elementCount: 1073741823 (~1.07 billion)
Real payload: 1 tiny string element ("A")
=== RESULT ===
Exception: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
Time to allocate+fail: 24 ms
Heap used before: 4 MB
Heap used after (at failure point): 2 MB
JVM max heap (-Xmx): 128 MB

A 72-byte input forces ~4.1 GB of real allocation before failing on an 8 GB heap, and crashes a 128 MB heap in 24 ms — over 50,000x amplification between input size and forced allocation.

To reproduce: mvn -q compile dependency:build-classpath -Dmdep.outputFile=cp.txt && java -Xmx128m -cp "target/classes:$(cat cp.txt)" poc.Poc

Impact

Uncontrolled resource consumption (CWE-770 / CWE-400) via native Java deserialization: any application that runs ObjectInputStream.readObject() on data reachable by an attacker, and has Guava on its classpath (true for a large fraction of the JVM ecosystem), can be crashed with a single ~72-byte payload, regardless of what type the application itself expected to deserialize.

Severity

CVSS 3.1: AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H — identical vector to CVE-2018-10237, the precedent this is a sibling of. Recomputed with the full formula: exploitability = 8.22×0.85×0.44×0.85×0.85 = 2.221; ISS = 1-(1×1×0.44) = 0.56; impact = 6.42×0.56 = 3.595; base = roundup(5.816) = 5.9 (Medium).

Affected

com.google.guava:guava, all editions (-jre/-android) — confirmed on the current latest release, 33.7.1-jre. CompactHashMap/CompactHashSet/CompactLinkedHashMap/CompactLinkedHashSet have had this same readObject/allocArrays shape for a long time (probably since they were added in Guava 23.6), and similarly for MapMakerInternalMap (which was introduced in Guava 4.0); not tested against older individual releases.

Suggested fix

Apply the same defense already used elsewhere in this codebase: either clamp the initial init() capacity to a small constant regardless of the declared elementCount (as HashBiMap.readObject() already does — init(16); // resist hostile attempts to allocate gratuitous heap) and grow incrementally as elements are actually read, or grow the backing arrays incrementally per iteration of the deserialization loop (as the fixed AtomicDoubleArray.readObject() does via ImmutableLongArray.Builder) instead of eagerly sizing to the full attacker-declared count on first insert.

Package URL(s):
  • pkg:maven/com.google.guava/guava@33.3.1-jre
CVE-2026-34479mediumlog4j-core>=2.7,<2.25.42.25.46.9
CVE-2026-34480mediumlog4j-core>=2.0-alpha1,<2.25.42.25.46.9
CVE-2025-48924mediumcommons-lang3>=3.0,<3.18.03.18.06.5
CVE-2025-68161mediumlog4j-core>=2.0-beta9,<2.25.32.25.36.3
CVE-2026-34477mediumlog4j-core>=2.12.0,<2.25.42.25.46.3
CVE-2026-49844mediumlog4j-api>=2.13.1,<2.25.52.25.56.3
CVE-2025-62813unspecifiedlz4>=1.9.3-2not fixed3.1
CVE-2026-5358unspecifiedglibc>0not fixed3.1

Severity Levels

Exploitation could lead to severe consequences, such as system compromise or data loss. Requires immediate attention.

Vulnerability could be exploited relatively easily and lead to significant impact. Requires prompt attention.

Exploitation is possible but might require specific conditions. Impact is moderate. Should be addressed in a timely manner.

Exploitation is difficult or impact is minimal. Address when convenient or as part of regular maintenance.

Severity is not determined, informational, or negligible. Review based on context.

Sliplane Icon
About Sliplane

Sliplane is a cloud platform that makes deploying and scaling your apps simple. Launch in minutes and grow as you go, containers included.

Try Sliplane for free

About the CVE Scanner

What is a CVE?

CVE stands for Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures. It is a standardized identifier for known security vulnerabilities, allowing developers and organizations to track and address potential risks effectively. For more information, visit cve.mitre.org.

About the CVE Scanner

The CVE Scanner is a powerful tool that helps you identify known vulnerabilities in your Docker images. By scanning your images against a comprehensive database of Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs), you can ensure that your applications are secure and up-to-date. For more details, checkout the NIST CVE Database.

How the CVE Scanner Works

The CVE Scanner analyzes your Docker images against a comprehensive database of known vulnerabilities. It uses Docker Scout under the hood to provide detailed insights into affected packages, severity levels, and available fixes, empowering you to take immediate action.

Why CVE Scanning is Essential for Your Docker Images

With the rise of supply chain attacks, ensuring the security of your applications has become more critical than ever. CVE scanning plays a vital role in identifying vulnerabilities that could be exploited by attackers, especially those introduced through dependencies and third-party components. Regularly scanning and securing your Docker images is essential to protect your applications from these evolving threats.

Benefits of CVE Scanning

  • Enhanced Security: Detect and mitigate vulnerabilities before they are exploited.
  • Compliance: Meet industry standards and regulatory requirements for secure software.
  • Proactive Maintenance: Stay ahead of potential threats by addressing vulnerabilities early.

The Importance of Patching Docker Images

Patching your Docker images is a critical step in maintaining the security and stability of your applications. By regularly updating your images to include the latest security patches, you can address known vulnerabilities and reduce the risk of exploitation. This proactive approach ensures that your applications remain resilient against emerging threats and helps maintain compliance with security best practices.

Want to deploy this image?

Try out Sliplane - a simple Docker hosting solution. It provides you with the tools to deploy, manage and scale your containerized applications.